<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging – You’re Doing it WRONG! (Pt 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/blogging-%e2%80%93-you%e2%80%99re-doing-it-wrong-pt-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/blogging-%e2%80%93-you%e2%80%99re-doing-it-wrong-pt-1/</link>
	<description>Driving Quality Traffic to Your Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 09:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/blogging-%e2%80%93-you%e2%80%99re-doing-it-wrong-pt-1/comment-page-1/#comment-12409</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/?p=1018#comment-12409</guid>
		<description>Nice post and tips.

Get a few simple things down, and your blog traffic will grow.  It really isn&#039;t rocket science..lol  Just takes repeating the steps on a regular basis to see some great results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post and tips.</p>
<p>Get a few simple things down, and your blog traffic will grow.  It really isn&#8217;t rocket science..lol  Just takes repeating the steps on a regular basis to see some great results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keira</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/blogging-%e2%80%93-you%e2%80%99re-doing-it-wrong-pt-1/comment-page-1/#comment-12380</link>
		<dc:creator>Keira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/?p=1018#comment-12380</guid>
		<description>@Aaron - Just saw your comment and I agree completely about fact checking and overly opinionated blogs that are nothing but negative. 

No images is as bad as too many. It makes the text look bigger and less friendly. Most blogs don&#039;t have a good font and format style for their text so it comes off very utilitarian and hard to read.

Insider vocab is something I strive myself to always define in a post, but could definitely be accused of forgetting to do, especially when talking about romance novels. How much is too much when it comes to jargon for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aaron &#8211; Just saw your comment and I agree completely about fact checking and overly opinionated blogs that are nothing but negative. </p>
<p>No images is as bad as too many. It makes the text look bigger and less friendly. Most blogs don&#8217;t have a good font and format style for their text so it comes off very utilitarian and hard to read.</p>
<p>Insider vocab is something I strive myself to always define in a post, but could definitely be accused of forgetting to do, especially when talking about romance novels. How much is too much when it comes to jargon for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keira</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/blogging-%e2%80%93-you%e2%80%99re-doing-it-wrong-pt-1/comment-page-1/#comment-12058</link>
		<dc:creator>Keira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/?p=1018#comment-12058</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome! <img src='http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis Chappell</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/blogging-%e2%80%93-you%e2%80%99re-doing-it-wrong-pt-1/comment-page-1/#comment-12045</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis Chappell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/?p=1018#comment-12045</guid>
		<description>Hi Keira,

Thanks for replies!  Both offer great suggestions and I really appreciate your feedback and links.

Too bad I don&#039;t write romance...;)

Cheers

Curtis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Keira,</p>
<p>Thanks for replies!  Both offer great suggestions and I really appreciate your feedback and links.</p>
<p>Too bad I don&#8217;t write romance&#8230;;)</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Curtis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keira</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/blogging-%e2%80%93-you%e2%80%99re-doing-it-wrong-pt-1/comment-page-1/#comment-11991</link>
		<dc:creator>Keira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/?p=1018#comment-11991</guid>
		<description>You might also want to consider a blog tour as an author. You could find several self-help, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailywritingtips.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;language &amp; writing,&lt;/a&gt; and health blogs and set something up with them. Many bloggers would be happy to give you space for interesting and well written content. (See my post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.loveromancepassion.com/should-authors-own-a-blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Should Authors Own a Blog?&lt;/a&gt;) 

Get yourself setup with a 2 or 3 line bio with a link back to your blog and you&#039;ll start to see a lot more traffic. 

For the guest blogs, you could come up with several blogs that are related to your book but are not excerpts before seeking space so if you&#039;re accepted on a blog you can immediately hand them an article. If you get more blogs interested than anticipated ask some of the bloggers if they have any topic ideas for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might also want to consider a blog tour as an author. You could find several self-help, <a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/" rel="nofollow">language &amp; writing,</a> and health blogs and set something up with them. Many bloggers would be happy to give you space for interesting and well written content. (See my post <a href="http://www.loveromancepassion.com/should-authors-own-a-blog/" rel="nofollow">Should Authors Own a Blog?</a>) </p>
<p>Get yourself setup with a 2 or 3 line bio with a link back to your blog and you&#8217;ll start to see a lot more traffic. </p>
<p>For the guest blogs, you could come up with several blogs that are related to your book but are not excerpts before seeking space so if you&#8217;re accepted on a blog you can immediately hand them an article. If you get more blogs interested than anticipated ask some of the bloggers if they have any topic ideas for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keira</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/blogging-%e2%80%93-you%e2%80%99re-doing-it-wrong-pt-1/comment-page-1/#comment-11989</link>
		<dc:creator>Keira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/?p=1018#comment-11989</guid>
		<description>What if you geared your blogging posts toward authors who blog instead of regular bloggers? It would be more helpful I would think, give you an interesting spin, and would continue the feel of your blog which is about your book (primarily yes?) and your accumulated blogging experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you geared your blogging posts toward authors who blog instead of regular bloggers? It would be more helpful I would think, give you an interesting spin, and would continue the feel of your blog which is about your book (primarily yes?) and your accumulated blogging experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis Chappell</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/blogging-%e2%80%93-you%e2%80%99re-doing-it-wrong-pt-1/comment-page-1/#comment-11961</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis Chappell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/?p=1018#comment-11961</guid>
		<description>Hi Keira,

Interesting post, but I do have a question/comment that I&#039;m hoping you can expand upon…

My blog, Reading Between The Lines, The Hidden Power of Language was originally set-up as a promotional tool for the up-coming book of the same title.  

The book covers a myriad of topics, all aligned with a non-fiction/self-help publication including quantum science, meditation, etc (this isn’t a plug for the book!).  

In addition to that varying subject matter, I&#039;ve found the whole blogging experience to be quite fascinating, so I’m also sharing posts about my newbie experiences while learning about blogging (as you are here).

There are two posts currently providing the most referral visitors at the moment; one from my primary subject mater and the second is about my blogging experience.  

If I had followed your advice to ‘stay on topic’ I would only have half the visitors, however I’ve been asking myself the same question?

Am I deluding (and potentially putting off) self-help readers when they land on a post about blogging or vice versa?

My primary subject matter is by default a broad array of genre&#039;s, so what&#039;s the best way to keep focused on a single topic which includes so many supporting topics???

Write On!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Keira,</p>
<p>Interesting post, but I do have a question/comment that I&#8217;m hoping you can expand upon…</p>
<p>My blog, Reading Between The Lines, The Hidden Power of Language was originally set-up as a promotional tool for the up-coming book of the same title.  </p>
<p>The book covers a myriad of topics, all aligned with a non-fiction/self-help publication including quantum science, meditation, etc (this isn’t a plug for the book!).  </p>
<p>In addition to that varying subject matter, I&#8217;ve found the whole blogging experience to be quite fascinating, so I’m also sharing posts about my newbie experiences while learning about blogging (as you are here).</p>
<p>There are two posts currently providing the most referral visitors at the moment; one from my primary subject mater and the second is about my blogging experience.  </p>
<p>If I had followed your advice to ‘stay on topic’ I would only have half the visitors, however I’ve been asking myself the same question?</p>
<p>Am I deluding (and potentially putting off) self-help readers when they land on a post about blogging or vice versa?</p>
<p>My primary subject matter is by default a broad array of genre&#8217;s, so what&#8217;s the best way to keep focused on a single topic which includes so many supporting topics???</p>
<p>Write On!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/blogging-%e2%80%93-you%e2%80%99re-doing-it-wrong-pt-1/comment-page-1/#comment-11771</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtrafficexchange.com/?p=1018#comment-11771</guid>
		<description>Add to this, blogs that give overly positive reviews to everything.

blogs that use extremely dense &quot;insider vocab&quot; that a beginner won&#039;t recognize.

blogs that confuse themselves with legitimate news - i.e. report on series topics but lack all forms of fact checking.

contrarian blogs.  I.e. blogs that are not founded on informing about a topic but are rather anti (insert inane topic here) pieces. - 99% of the time, as soon as you get their title you know what they&#039;ll say anyways - so why read them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add to this, blogs that give overly positive reviews to everything.</p>
<p>blogs that use extremely dense &#8220;insider vocab&#8221; that a beginner won&#8217;t recognize.</p>
<p>blogs that confuse themselves with legitimate news &#8211; i.e. report on series topics but lack all forms of fact checking.</p>
<p>contrarian blogs.  I.e. blogs that are not founded on informing about a topic but are rather anti (insert inane topic here) pieces. &#8211; 99% of the time, as soon as you get their title you know what they&#8217;ll say anyways &#8211; so why read them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

